When synthesizing multiple sources in a research paper, the writer should:

Question

Accepted Answer

Identify patterns, agreements, and disagreements among sources to build a cohesive argument. Identifying patterns, agreements, and disagreements among sources to build a cohesive argument is the hallmark of effective synthesis. Synthesis goes beyond summarizing individual sources - it weaves together ideas from multiple sources to create a new, unified understanding. The writer analyzes how sources relate to each other and to the thesis, creating an integrated discussion.

Presenting each source in a separate paragraph without connecting them is merely a summary of individual sources, not synthesis. Copying the longest quotes represents poor engagement with sources and potential over-reliance on direct quotation. Choosing only agreeable sources while ignoring contrary evidence is cherry-picking, which weakens the argument and violates academic integrity by presenting a distorted view of the evidence.

Source synthesis is one of the most challenging and important skills tested on the CLEP College Composition Modular exam. Effective synthesis demonstrates critical thinking by showing how multiple sources converge on a topic, where they diverge, and what these patterns mean for the writer's argument. This skill distinguishes college-level research writing from simple report writing.

CLEP College Composition Modular: Question of the Day

Get a free CLEP College Composition Modular question every day

Ready for the full CLEP College Composition Modular? Earn 3 college credits.